Beyond the needle: innovative approaches for reducing blood culture contamination rates in the emergency department

Kenny S, Raouf Z, Sheridan A, McCarthy I, Rothwell-Kelly G, Menzies D, Schaffer K.
St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Ir Med J. 2025:118(8); P142

Aim
This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Kurin Lock device, which diverts the initial 0.15 mL of blood, and ChloraPrep (2% alcoholic chlorhexidine) in reducing blood culture contamination rates in emergency departments.

Methods
The study was conducted across three phases: pre-intervention, intervention, and postintervention. Before the intervention, alcohol or chlorhexidine wipes were used for skin antisepsis. The intervention phase introduced the Kurin Lock device and ChloraPrep, accompanied by staff training. Contamination rates were analyzed using the chi-square test.

Results
During the intervention phase, contamination rates significantly decreased from 18.4% (preintervention) to 4.9% (p < 0.001). However, in the post-intervention phase, contamination rates rebounded to 18.1%.

Discussion
The study demonstrates that combining specimen diversion systems with enhanced antisepsis protocols effectively reduces blood culture contamination. However, maintaining these improvements over time remains a challenge, emphasizing the need for sustained adherence to the intervention.

Excerpt: “Blood specimen diversion systems, such as the Kurin Lock device, effectively reduce contamination by diverting the initial blood sample likely to contain skin contaminants, a method well-supported in the literature.  A recent review further highlights their role in improving diagnostic precision.[Al Mohajer M and Lasco T. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023] In April 2024 the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issued Medical Technologies Guidance 77, which recommends blood diversion systems such as Kurin Lock for EDs with contamination rates > 2.4 %, providing a strong policy mandate for their use.”

Read full text here

Improving Blood Culture Contamination in an Adult Emergency Department Utilizing Sideline Technology

Lesly Evert, BSN, RN, CEN, EMT-P and Tina Nielson, RN, MS, CEN, ACNS-BC, APNP
Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI
Emergency Nursing 2025

Purpose
The purpose of this project was to decrease the BCC rate in an Academic Medical Center and expand knowledge about adherence to best practice to positively affect patient outcomes.

Problem
Emergency Department blood culture contaminations rate reported at 6%.

Blood culture contamination (BCC) can lead to:

  • Increased patient length of stay
  • Cost increase of $6026 per patient stay
  • Cost $4538 per false positive specimen
  • Misdiagnosis or unintentional harm
  • Increase risk for hospital-acquired infections (HAI) and impair hospital efforts to reduce HAI
  • False Positive blood cultures impair antibiotic optimization

Gap Analysis:

  • Educational inconsistency and variation in blood culture collection
  • Inconsistent waste prior to specimen collection
  • Blood Culture fill volume variation

Clinical Question
In an adult Emergency Department, does skin prep and wasting blood before specimen collection using a specimen diversion device (ISDD) reduce contamination rates of blood cultures to < 1%?

Setting and Sample

  • Emergency Department in the Midwest, Level I, Academic Medical Center
  • ED staff collecting blood culture specimens

Design
An evidenced-based practice project utilizing the John Hopkins-Evidence Based Practice Model

Methods

Educational Strategies:

  • Newsletter, videos, skills fair, presentations, peer observation, poster and signage
  • In-person Initial Specimen Diversion Device (ISDD) training
  • Process feedback via direct communication and leader rounding
  • Standardized tools

Learning Objectives:

  • Improve skin preparation, sample waste, and optimal fill volume for blood culture collection
  • Create a consistent practice of blood culture specimen collection
  • Decreased BCC rates

Data collected:

  • Timeframe: July 2023-August 2024
  • Blood culture specimen collection observation
  • BCC case review
  • BCC rates
  • ISDD utilization (device inventory)

Results


Findings/Outcomes
Results

  • 100% of observations demonstrated improved consistent blood culture collection practice
  • BCC rates decreased from 6% to 2.9% during the initial pilot (52% improvement)
  • Lowest BCC rate during project was 0.9%
  • Projected annual cost savings:
  • Decreased in ~40 false positive per month:~$2.2 M
  • Decreased in patient length of stay (2 days):~$2.9M
  • Total Savings of ~5.1M annually

Conclusions
This project demonstrated that a multimodal approach improved BCC rates. Methods include:

  • Reinforcement of the crucial role staff have in blood culture collection and the impact it has on improving patient care outcomes
  • Observations and feedback enhanced accountability
  • Champion support by peer and leader rounding
  • Engage stakeholders in device evaluation to promote practice sustainability

A limitation of the project was we were unable to account for compliance with ISDD utilization.

Implications for Practice
Standardized education and implementation of ISDD for waste diversion should be initiated for consistent blood culture collection.

Acknowledgement
ED Shared Governance, nursing staff, leadership and lab for their support and ongoing focus to providing quality patient care

For additional information please contact:
Lesly Evert, BSN, RN, CEN, EMT-P
Emergency Department, Froedtert Hospital
Lesly.Evert@froedtert.com

Read full text here

Analysis of the Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department: A Single-Center Study

Karlath FA, Rehan MA, Geigor A, Mitchell J, Arnaout S, Greenough TC, and Elliso RT.
UMass Memorial Health
Open Forum Infectious Disease June 17, 2025

Background
There have been major advances in blood culture technology in the last decade with both faster and more sensitive pathogen detection as well as more precise species identification. We have performed a reassessment of the results of positive blood cultures in this new clinical microbiology era with a focus on contaminant identification.

Methods
A retrospective study was conducted including all patients with a blood culture collected in two UMass Memorial Health emergency departments from September 2019 through April 2020. Contaminants were identified by standard clinical microbiology lab criteria and by independent retrospective review by 3 infectious disease (ID) physicians and an Infectious Disease fellow.

Results
5,673 blood samples were obtained with 5,661 samples analyzed after 12 were deemed inconclusive by the ID physician review. Blood culture contaminants accounted for 22.5% of the positive blood cultures. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequent contaminant (33.4%) while Escherichia coli was the most frequent pathogen (21%) causing true bacteremia. Coagulasenegative staphylococci remain the most frequent cause of blood culture contamination with Staphylococcus epidermidis being the most common. Staphylococcus auricularis, Staphylococcus caprae, lentus, Staphylococcus pseudointermedius, Staphylococcus saccharolyticus, and Staphylococcus warneri were all determined to be contaminants in 100% of cases.

Relevant Conclusions
The results of the prospective controlled trial associated with this study affirm that the blood diversion device did lead to a decrease in blood culture contamination rates in busy ED in both the intention-to-use and actual-use analyses. “These devices offer a cost-effective and clinically beneficial strategy to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. We anticipate that this approach could help combat the issue of increasing antibiotic resistance.”

Read full text here

Impact of Initial Specimen Diversion Technique on Blood Culture Contamination Rates

Dhammika Navarathna, Janell Lukey
Veterans Affairs Central Texas Healthcare System
Fed Pract. 2025;42(6):e0596. June 17. doi:10.12788/fp.0596

Background
A false-positive blood culture contamination rate of 3.0% is a widely recognized hospital benchmark. In November 2017, the Veterans Affairs Central Texas Healthcare System (VACTHCS), a 146-bed urban teaching hospital with about 30,000 annual emergency department (ED) visits, introduced the initial specimen diversion technique (ISDT) to reduce its contamination rate. ISDT uses blood draws to isolate and discard the initial portion of blood collected, known to be more prone to contamination from skin bacteria.

Methods
This retrospective comparative study of ISDT effectiveness was conducted at VACTHCS. Data were collected 36 months before and after ISDT implementation. Adults admitted to VACTHCS through the ED who required blood cultures for clinical suspicion of infection were included. Data were reviewed 36 months postimplementation to determine the effectiveness of the ISDT intervention.

Results
There was a marked decrease in contamination rates within the VACTHCS ED. Pre-implementation, the mean contamination rate was 4.5% (95% CI, 3.90-4.90), which decreased to 2.6% (95% CI, 2.10-3.20) following ISDT implementation (P < .001).

Conclusions
Targeted interventions such as ISDT may reduce blood culture contamination rates in the ED. Incorporating ISDT at VACTHCS resulted in an overall blood culture contamination reduction and improved patient care.

Read full text here

Reducing the Blood Culture Contamination Rate in the Emergency Department: A Good Start

E Browne, M Russell, G Kalukondanahally, M Abbas, O Keane, and H McDermott
Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Poster number: P1939

Background
Blood culture is the primary diagnostic test available to detect bloodstream infection1, however contamination during collection remains a significant issue

  • Contamination complicates clinical interpretation, and can have significant clinical and financial consequences, including unnecessary antimicrobial treatment, increased length of hospital stays, and escalating healthcare costs2,3
  • Current guidelines recommend that blood culture contamination rates should not exceed 3%, with a goal of 1% when best practices are followed2,4
  • In Q1 of 2024, Beaumont Hospital (Dublin, Ireland) Emergency Department had a median contamination rate of 10%
  • Kurin Lock® blood culture collection sets divert the initial 0.15ml of blood drawn (which may contain contaminants from the patient’s skin) into a flash chamber
  • The device is easy to use, with minimal training required, and costs approx. £20
  • Clinical trial evidence suggests that Kurin Lock® is a safe and effective way of reducing blood culture contamination rates, compared with standard blood culture collection5

Objectives
Aim of the quality improvement project: reduce blood culture contamination rate in Beaumont Hospital ED by implementation of Kurin Lock® device for blood culture collection

Methods
Kurin Lock® introduced on pilot basis (8th May to 2nd July 2024)

130 ED healthcare workers (HCWs) trained in device use

HCWs document blood culture collection

  • Complete and sign Kurin® form
  • Affix patient label
  • Deposit form in collection bucket


Weekly form collection and data entry

  • Forms collected and processed
  • Data (date and time of blood culture collection, HCW name, patient episode number) entered into Excel


Incentive

  • Restaurant voucher awarded for most Kurin® blood cultures collected


Blood culture contamination data sourced from Beaumont surveillance database

Weekly comparison of contamination rates

  • Kurin® vs Traditional Method
  • Contaminants determined by Clinical Microbiology Team

Results
A total of 768 blood cultures were collected in ED over 8 weeks (see figure 2)

  • The contamination rate was significantly lower with the Kurin® Lock (2.71%) compared to the traditional method (10.4%) (χ² = 12.41, df=1, p= 0.0004)
  • Staff adherence to using the Kurin® Lock averaged 28.38% (range: 16%-46%) (see figure 4).

"

Discussion
Implementation of the Kurin® Lock in Beaumont Hospital ED resulted in a significant reduction in blood culture contamination rates compared to the traditional collection method.

  • NICE guidelines5(2024) recommend the Kurin® Lock to reduce blood culture contamination in emergency departments
  • Following the pilot trial, a business proposal for permanent adoption of the Kurin® Lock was developed and approved, leading to its formal implementation in Beaumont Hospital ED in March 2025.
  • Economic modelling suggests a high probability of cost savings when used in EDs with baseline contamination rates >9%, with previous estimates indicating potential savings of ~£5,000 per contaminated blood culture6.
  • Despite its benefits, low adherence to Kurin® Lock use among ED HCWs was a key challenge in our pilot trial
  • To address this, an ED staff survey and feedback session could identify barriers. Targeted education, training, and incentivisation for ED doctors, nurses, and staff could improve adherence. Involving the phlebotomy and IV cannulation teams in blood culture collection may streamline and standardise the process, maximising impact.

Read full text here

REFERENCES:
1 “Investigation of blood cultures (for organisms other than Mycobacterium species)” (UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations, PHE 2019)
2 Doern, GV et al “Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem”. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2020; Oct 30;33(1).
3 Palavecino, EL et al “Laboratory approaches to determining blood culture contamination rates: an ASM Laboratory Practices Subcommittee report”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2024; Feb 14;62(2)
4 CLSI. Principles and Procedures for Blood Cultures. 2nd Ed. CLSI Guideline M47. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.
5 “Kurin Lock for blood culture collection” (NICE guidance, April 2024)
6 Alahmadi, YM et al “Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital setting”. Journal of Hospital Infection 2011; Mar 77(3):233-6

Effect of Kurin on blood culture contamination rates and cost savings

Patricia Le, Anita Smith, Joyce Pazhayattil, Ryan Walters, and Stephen Cavalieri from CHI Health – Creighton University Medical Center, Bergan Mercy, Omaha, NE

Background
Blood cultures are susceptible to contamination with skin commensal organisms. Contaminated blood cultures cost hospitals $4,000 to $10,000 per patient and extend hospital stay by 1 to 8.4 days. Initial specimen diversion devices (ISDDs) function by diverting a small volume of initial blood into culture bottles. Our study assesses blood culture contamination rates and associated cost savings of multiple Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI) sites using Kurin®, which diverts 0.15 mL of initial blood drawn, compared to the standard blood collection method, which uses a butterfly needle and chlorhexidine without any blood diversion.

Design
We performed a retrospective study between October 2022 and September 2023 across Creighton University Medical Center, Lakeside, Immanuel, Midlands, and Mercy Council Bluffs Hospital. Contamination rates were stratified by Kurin® use and presented as percent alongside an Agresti-Coull confidence interval. Contamination rates were compared between Kurin® and standard method sets both overall across all facilities and within each individual facility using the log binomial regression model. All analyses were conducted using SAS v. 9.4 with two-tailed p < .05 used for statistical significance. The cost savings and reduction in contamination rates after Kurin® implementation were calculated. The cost of supplies was $17.50 compared to its standard method counterparts of $1.95. We estimated the cost of contaminated blood culture per patient as $4,538 (from a 2022 study by Marcelino et al.).

Results
There was a total of 13,801 blood draws from the standard method and 15,011 blood draws from Kurin®. Kurin® averaged 47% lower risk of contamination compared to the standard method (95%, CI: 38.8-54.0%, p < 0.001). The average blood culture contamination reduction rate was 1.9% for the sites that showed statistically significant reduction (see Table). When projected over 12 months, the estimated total cost savings was $1,063,967.

Conclusions
This study is the first to evaluate blood culture contamination rates before and after Kurin® use across multiple departments while previous studies studied only the emergency department. A 2023 review paper by Mohajer and Lasco found that four of nine studies found reduction in contamination rate to less than or equal to 1% after Kurin® implementation. Future studies could stratify contamination rates between staff such as nurses and phlebotomists and departments such as the emergency department and intensive care unit.

Read full text here

Do blood contamination reduction devices work? A single institution comparison

Maria E Navas, Salman Siddiq, Laurie Bauer, Jose A Rivera, Anita J White, Stella Ache, Mark Osborne, Nataliya Kachaluba, Brian Klonowski, Christine Robbins, and Curtis Donskey from VA Medical Center, VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System

Abstract
We compare two initial specimen diversion devices evaluated over 3 months to investigate their utility in lowering blood culture contamination rates at or below 1%. Overall contamination rates during trial periods were 2.46% and 2.60% but usage was low, whereas device-specific contamination rates were 0.68% and 0.8%, respectively.

Results
During the first phase (Kurin) 441 of 1,626 (27.12%) BC sets returned with a completed device slip versus 254 of 1,126 (22.55%) during the second phase (Steripath). During the trial periods, the contamination rate was 2.46% for the Kurin and 2.60% for the Steripath, which was lower than the same months the prior year (3%), but higher than the desired 50% reduction from the prior year, and higher than the new 1% benchmark. The device-specific contamination rates were 0.68% (3/441) for the Kurin device and 0.8% (2/254) for the Steripath device. Twenty-six surveys were analyzed from Steripath and 20 from Kurin users. The device was rated worse than the standard of care by 73% of users for Steripath and 30% for Kurin. The need for the phlebotomist to activate the Steripath by squeezing the device created complications for some users. No device failures were reported with Kurin.

Read full text here

Prospective trial of a passive diversion device to reduce blood culture contamination

Sami Arnaout, Shannon Stock, Julia M Clifford, Thomas C Greenough, Azalea Wedig, Michael J Mitchell, and Richard T Ellison. UMass Memorial Medical Center

Background
Blood culture contaminants can lead to inappropriate antibiotic use, prolonged length of stay, and additional hospital costs. Several devices have been developed to reduce the risk of blood culture contamination by diverting a portion of the initial blood sample from the blood culture bottle. We assessed the effectiveness of 1 blood diversion device (BDD) in a prospective trial performed at the 2 separate emergency departments (EDs) of an academic medical center.

Methods
A multiphase prospective crossover trial was performed with the BDD in use at 1 ED and standard equipment at the other ED for 10 weeks, and a second 10-week study phase was conducted with the use of the BDD and standard equipment in the EDs reversed. Contaminants were identified both by standard clinical microbiology lab criteria and by independent retrospective review by 3 infectious disease (ID) physicians. The primary analysis was performed based on intention-to-use data using the physician review of positive blood cultures.

Results
A total of 5637 blood samples were obtained, with 5625 samples analyzed after 12 blood culture results were deemed inconclusive by the ID physician review. The University ED had a higher blood culture contamination rate of 2.9% compared with the Memorial ED at 1.4%. In an intention-to-use analysis, the overall contamination rates were 2.0% and 2.9% in the BDD and standard equipment periods, respectively (P =.03), and in an actual-use analysis the contamination rates were 1.2% and 3.0% for the BDD and standard equipment, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusion
The BDD was associated with significantly lower blood culture contamination rates at the institution’s 2 EDs, with a stronger effect noted at the campus caring for higher acuity patients.

Implementation of an initial specimen blood culture diversion device to reduce blood culture contamination: lessons learned

Francine Touzard Romo, Dianne Auld2, Alison de Abreu, Kimberly Roberts, Gail Jackson, Valerie Whitehead, Emerald O’Rourke, Phinnara Has, Leonard A Mermel. Lifespan Health System, Providence, RI

Background
Lifespan healthcare system implemented the Kurin Lock® ISDD in three acute care hospitals (Rhode Island Hospital [RIH]—a 714-bed tertiary care teaching hospital, The Miriam Hospital [TMH]—a 247-bed community teaching hospital, and Newport Hospital [NH]—a 129-bed community hospital) beginning October 2022 and assessed the impact on Blood culture contamination BCxC and vancomycin utilization in adult EDs, intensive care unit, and step-down units (ICU/SDUs). Blood cultures were obtained by nurses (all 3 hospitals) and phlebotomists (NH) after training by the manufacturer. Blood culture technique was followed per protocol, and growth was monitored using the BioMérieux VIRTUO system. No changes in phlebotomy, laboratory practices, or antimicrobial stewardship interventions were implemented during the study period.

Methods
BCxC rates were calculated dividing the number of contaminated cultures (per CDC NHSN commensal list) over the total number of blood cultures/month. The pre-implementation period was defined as the 6 months prior, and the post-implementation period were the months following implementation through December 2023, excluding the month of implementation. Mean BCxC rates prior to Kurin Lock® implementation and after implementation were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. An interrupted time-series analysis was performed using binomial regression models; implementation dates were standardized as “Day 0.” Vancomycin days of therapy (DOT) by order entry indication of “bacteremia” was analyzed using a generalized linear model (Stata/MP 18.0; College Station, TX).

Results
The mean (SD) BCxC rate for all three hospitals and locations declined by 37% [from 3.0% (2.1) to 1.9% (1.4) after the ISDD implementation (P = 0.009)]). The mean number of blood cultures per month was similar during the pre- and post-Kurin period. In time-series analysis, we observed an abrupt 65% decline in BCxC following education and implementation of the Kurin Lock® ISDD at all three hospitals and locations (P = 0.04). Post-Kurin BCxC rates remained lower than pre-Kurin rates at 400 days after implementation; however, increasing BCxC rates were observed post-implementation, particularly in the Eds. TMH and NPH ED BCxC rates were already declining pre-Kurin Lock® implementation. Nonetheless, rates of contamination only reached 1% or less after the ISDD was implemented. The authors did not observe any significant change in mean vancomycin DOT for bacteremia up to 200 days after Kurin implementation in ICU/SDUs.

Conclusion
Although lower BCxC rates were sustained with time, the abrupt decline in rates and intermittent spikes resulting in an upward trend highlights the critical value of continuous quality improvement efforts focusing on best practices paired with the device implementation. An independent review of blood culture collection practices by the manufacturer noted: (1) occasional blood draws from existing intravascular catheters; (2) inconsistent skin preparation; (3) placement of blood culture bottles on patient’s beds; (4) inconsistent stocking of supplies; and (5) new staff unawareness of allowing lock side channel blood flow to stop before accessing the blood culture bottles. In addition, ED staff were not utilizing peripheral IV sets with an attached extension (PV-18) designed to reduce contamination from touch points. Based on our findings, some action items we suggest are critical when implementing an ISDD include: hands-on education when onboarding new staff, emphasizing the importance of drawing blood from fresh venipuncture and not from previously inserted peripheral IVs, establishing PAR levels for all blood culture collection items, stocking enough supplies in IV carts, and provide targeted feedback to individual staff associated with high levels of blood culture contamination.

Implementation of the Kurin Lock® ISDD lowered BCxC in large academic and community hospital settings. Continuous quality improvement efforts regarding best practices for blood collection through skill development and staff accountability are important to assure the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this intervention.

Read full text here.